Processing Major Taxa Useful Literature Equipment & Suppliers Safe Working Practice

Sample Processing - Laboratory Methods

Index

1. MEIOFAUNA EXTRACTION

Fixed sediment samples contain a mixture of formalin and sediment components such as silt, clay, sand grains and organic detritus, in addition to the fauna. Although the following processes are often referred to as 'extraction of the fauna', in reality what we are endeavouring to do is to extract various sediment components, so as to end up with the fauna from the original sample and as little else as possible. Figure 1 is a flow-diagram showing the order of the processes and the type of decisions which need to be made. Equipment and materials required for processing samples are listed in here

Meiofauna-free water supply Prior to processing samples it is important to check that the laboratory freshwater supply does not contain meiofauna. To do this run tapwater through a 63µm sieve for 5-10 minutes and check the contents of the sieve (if any) under a binocular microscope. If meiofauna is present it is necessary to make some arrangement to have it removed. Many of the following techniques involve washing and concentrating meiofauna on sieves with freshwater. Attaching a flexible tube to the freshwater tap is highly recommended, as it greatly increases one's control over the direction and strength of the flow. Meiofauna are small, so do not use a strong jet of water, and splashing must be avoided.

1.1 Removing silt/clay and large fragments

An initial washing of the sample with freshwater on a 63µm sieve removes the finer sediment components, silt and clay, and much of the formalin. Take care not to overload the sieve, larger muddier samples may need to be sieved in smaller amounts. Puddling may help if the sieve becomes clogged. Continue washing until the water passing through the sieve is relatively clear. For some fine sediments, especially if the initial samples are small, this is sufficient to reduce the sample to a quantity that can be extracted with Ludox (see section 1.4).

Some types of samples may contain significant quantities of larger material such as leaf or paper fragments. It may be helpful in such circumstances to remove this material by washing the sample through a 1mm sieve nested on top of the 63µm sieve. Extreme care is necessary not to clog the smaller mesh as it is not in direct view. The contents of the 1mm sieve should be checked under a binocular microscope to ensure that any meiofauna has been washed out of it.

1.2 Decantation

If, after initial washing, the sample contains appreciable quantities of sand, this can be removed by a decantation extraction. Wash the remaining sample into a 1 litre widemouth stoppered measuring cylinder (no more than 150ml of sediment at a time) and fill the cylinder to above the 1 litre mark with fresh water. Put in the stopper and vigorously shake and invert the cylinder 5-10 times to distribute the sediment evenly throughout the volume. Allow to stand briefly, probably for no more than 5 seconds, until most of the dense particles (mainly sand) have dropped out, then carefully pour the supernatant onto a 63µm sieve. Repeat 3-6 times. As the next process is a flotation extraction with Ludox (see section 1.4) do not be too concerned if some fine sand appears on the 63µm sieve. It is good practice to check an aliquot of the sediment remaining in the cylinder for meiofauna before discarding it, particularly if the sample is one of the first to be processed from a new survey, to assess the efficiency of the extraction.

 

View Figure 1

 

Flow diagram illustrating the steps taken and decisions made during the initial processing of meiofaunal samples. The numbers in bold refer to sections in the text.

1.3 Preparing Ludox

The objective of flotation extraction is to suspend the fauna in a fluid which has a specific gravity very close to that of the animals themselves, so that the animals are neutrally buoyant and remain in suspension but sediment components are negatively buoyant and slowly sink. A variety of dense fluids have been used to extract fauna from sediments in the past. The disadvantage of most of them, such as NaCl or sucrose, is that they have a very high osmotic potential and therefore can damage some of the fauna. Ludox is a colloidal silica solution, primarily developed for use in iron foundries, with properties which make it ideal for the extraction of meiofauna. It is available in a range of grades, but Ludox TM is most widely used.

As supplied, Ludox TM has a specific gravity of 1.13 to 1.14. The specific gravity needed to extract meiofauna is approximately 1.15, so the stock solution must be diluted. Adding two parts fresh Ludox to three parts freshwater will give a solution of approximately the correct density, but the density should be measured with a hydrometer. Do not use seawater directly with Ludox, as this can cause the suspended silica to precipitate, rendering the sample useless.

Ludox is a colloidal silica solution. Small spills can dry to silica dust which is harmful . Spills should be mopped and cleaned up immediately and care must be taken when using Ludox. An example of a safe working practice for Ludox is included here. Sieves, glassware, and other equipment such as washbottles, which have been used for Ludox should be soaked in dilute NaOH solution and rinsed in hot water.

1.4 Ludox flotation

A number of centrifugation techniques involving Ludox have been used, but the following method has been found to be simple and effective. After decantation, or after initial washing if the sample consists of a small amount of material, carefully wash the extracted portion of the sediment to one side of the sieve, then wash it into a tallform beaker using Ludox. Add at least 10 times the sample volume of Ludox, made up to S.G. 1.15. Stir vigorously to distribute the sample evenly throughout the volume and leave to settle for at least 40 minutes or until there is a clear separation of a scum containing meiofauna floating on top of the Ludox and the sediment at the bottom of the beaker. It Some fine clay particles may remain in the sample even after washing and decantation and these will still remain in suspension even after several hours. They should be ignored as they will pass through a 63µm sieve. Carefully pour the supernatant through a 63µm sieve into a jug. Return the Ludox to the sample and repeat the flotation process 2-4 times. It may be necessary to check that the specific gravity of the Ludox has not been altered by water still in the sediment sample after its initial washing, if necessary add more concentrated ludox to restore the specific gravity to 1.15. After each flotation wash the extracted fauna thoroughly with fresh water. If the sample is not to be worked on immediately, preserve it with 70% alcohol with 5% glycerol or 4% formalin in a suitable container, such as a glass tube with an airtight plastic closure.

2. PROCESSING MEIOFAUNA

The following methods are concerned with processing extracted samples to allow the quantification and identification of the meiofauna. Figure 2 is a flow diagram showing the order of the processes and the type of decisions, which need to be made. Equipment and materials required for processing meiofauna are listed in here.

2.1 Sorting

The sorting of meiofaunal samples is time-consuming and labour intensive. It is only necessary to sort samples if one is interested in identifying components of the meiofauna which cannot routinely be identified in whole mounts, such as harpacticoid copepods. It may be useful; however, to examine extracted samples, in water, under a binocular microscope with about 250× magnification, in order to check that animals are present, count individuals of major groups, or to carefully pick out larger pieces of detritus. A small petri dish with lines scored on the bottom is ideal for the purpose. The spacing between the lines should be slightly less than the field of view of the microscope. Picking out is done using fine stainless steel forceps for larger, more robust material or with a fine glass pipette for smaller more delicate organisms.


2.2 Subsampling

Typically, sediment samples contain large numbers of meiofaunal organisms, and it would be impossible to count and identify all of them. Meiobenthic communities are, however, patchy at small spatial scales, so simply taking smaller samples is not the answer. This is why we take larger samples and then routinely identify a proportion, extracted at random from the whole sample, which we refer to as a subsample. As a general rule, a subsample which contains at least 200 specimens is adequate for standard community analyses. It is helpful to keep the subsample size (defined as a fraction of the whole sample) constant within a particular study.

A simple but reliable subsampling apparatus consists of a ladle and a wide-mouthed plastic container marked with a volume corresponding to a specific number of ladle volumes. Details of this simple subsampling apparatus are given in here. If the sample has been stored in formalin or alcohol after extraction wash the sample with freshwater on a 63µm sieve. Wash the extracted sample into the plastic container with freshwater and add water until the total volume is equivalent to a known number of ladle volumes. The key to efficient subsampling with this apparatus is in agitating the contents of the container in such a way as to distribute the sample homogeneously throughout the volume. Simply stirring the sample with a circular motion concentrates the meiofauna. The best method is to use the ladle to vigorously agitate the sample with a vertical up and down motion for 20-30 seconds, then to carefully remove a single ladle-full into a 63µm sieve. Carefully rinse the ladle, collecting the washings on the sieve. If further subsamples are required the remaining volume must be agitated again prior to each removal. Once subsamples have been removed, the remaining sample should be returned to alcohol or formalin, and the size of subsample removed should be recorded on the container.

2.3 Evaporating to pure glycerol

Wash subsamples (or whole samples if subsampling has not been carried out) on a small 63µm sieve with a mixture of dilute glycerol. The exact recipe for this mixture is not important, but it should contain approximately 5% glycerol made up with either water or 10-30 % ethanol in water. This can be mixed up and stored in a labelled washbottle. Then wash the sample into a cavity block with the same mixture. Place the cavity block on a warm hotplate (20-30°C) for at least 24 hours to allow the water and ethanol to evaporate off, leaving the sample material in glycerol. If the material is to be left for longer than a day the cavity block should be partially covered to exclude dust. Although it has been washed several times, formalin fixed material often produces formalin fumes at this stage, and so it is a good idea to carry out the evaporation in a fume cupboard.

 

View Figure 2

 

Flow diagram illustrating the steps taken and the decisions made while processing and mounting meiofaunal samples after initial processing. The numbers in bold refer to sections in the text.


2.4 Preparing slides

Microscope slides should be prepared with paraffin wax rings (rectangular or circular) of similar proportions to the margins of the coverslips to be used to cover the finished preparations. The ring of wax should be complete, and there must be sufficient wax in the ring to effectively surround the sample and to seal the coverslip. It is not possible to give an infallible guide to the production of these rings, as several factors affect the quality of the resulting rings. Details of a metal applicator for making rectangular wax rings on microscope slides are given in here. Clean 76×39mm glass microscope slides with a tissue to remove dust. Melt paraffin wax (melting point 57-60ºC) in a crystallising basin or glass petri dish and leave the applicator in the wax to warm up. Do not overheat the wax, as this degrades it. Pure paraffin wax may be too brittle for satisfactory results, so adding some beeswax or white petroleum jelly to the wax is sometimes recommended. Keeping it level, lift the applicator from the wax and place it briefly on the slide (3 seconds or so), then return the dipper to the wax. A ring of paraffin wax should remain on the slide. Some workers press the applicator briefly (1 second) onto absorbent paper towel before placing it on the slide. The following are some frequently encountered problems, their possible causes and remedies.

(i) The applicator sticks, or the wax does not adhere properly, to the slide. This happens when the wax begins to solidify while the applicator is still in contact with the slide. The wax, the applicator or the slide are not warm enough, or the applicator has been left on the slide for too long.

(ii) The wax ring is too thin. This happens when the depth of wax in the container from which the applicator has been removed is too shallow, so an insufficient quantity is transferred to the slide.

(iii) The wax ring is uneven. Failure to keep the applicator level while transferring it to the slide can result in splashes and uneven rings. Not leaving the applicator on the slide for long enough can also result in uneven or thin rings.

(iv) The wax ring is too thick, or spreads too far. This occurs when the wax in the dish is too deep, or because the wax, the applicator or the slide are too hot.

Once prepared, the slides should be kept free of dust prior to use. Care should also be taken not to damage the rings during storage.

2.5 Mounting samples

If possible mount the sample whilst it is still warm from evaporaing to pure glycerol (section 2.3) as this makes the glycerol more fluid. Tilt the cavity block containing the sample material in glycerol and scrape the contents close to the lower edge with a flexible implement such as a quill. Carefully, but quickly, tip the material into the centre of the wax ring on the slide. If necessary, add a little more glycerol to the cavity block and repeat the process. Check the cavity block under a dissecting microscope to ensure that all the animals have been transferred to the slide. If there are still animals in the cavity block either add more glycerol and repeat the tipping process, or pick them out individually with a fine needle.

There is no substitute for experience in deciding how much material to put on a slide. If there is not enough material add an extra drop or two of glycerol. If it looks as though there is too much for one slide tip the material onto two or more slides. Carefully add a coverslip, making sure that it overlaps with the wax ring and that it makes contact with the glycerol. This helps to exclude air bubbles and also prevents melted wax from flowing over the sample. Transfer the slide to a warm hotplate (55-60°C) and carefully melt the wax. This seals the coverslip to the slide while retaining the sample underneath it, and must be a controlled process. Some workers prefer to melt the wax in sections, keeping the preparation close to the edge of the hotplate. As soon as the wax has melted gently remove the slide from the hotplate and place it on a level surface to allow the wax to solidify slowly. Once the wax has set record the details of the sample, or a code representing the relevant information, on the border of the slide with a diamond pencil. Excess wax can be removed using a sharp knife or scalpel. If the glycerol leaks out through imperfections in the wax ring this can be cleaned up using a tissue dipped in a small amount of acetone. The preparation is finished off by sealing it with two coats of a suitable xylene-resistant sealant (Fig. 3). Bioseal No. 2 mountant has been found to be very useful for this purpose.

 

View Figure 3

 

Generalised appearance of a completed slide. The sample is retained beneath the coverslip with a wax ring, the mount is sealed with a suitable compound, and the sample details are recorded near one edge.

As a general rule, problems encountered during the mounting process are irreversible, and another subsample will need to be taken. Some commonly encountered problems include:

  • Pieces of detritus left in the sample prevent the coverslip from settling evenly, leading to an uneven mount and often disrupting the integrity of the wax ring.
  • If there is too much glycerol on the slide, or the wax ring is too thin, the slide will leak. Although the fauna may still be analysed the mount can not be stored satisfactorily.
  • Having insufficient glycerol, or too much wax in the ring, can lead to molten wax flowing over the glycerol, which obscures the sample from view when it solidifies. This problem is provoked by failing to ensure that the glycerol is in contact with the coverslip before melting the wax ring, by having the hotplate at too high a temperature so that the wax melts too quickly and the wax and glycerol overheat, or by not keeping the slide level until the wax solidifies (which takes longer if the mount is too hot).

2.6 Scanning slides and recording positions

The slides are now ready for examination. Starting at one corner they should be scanned in a systematic way, such that the investigator can be sure that coverage is complete. The use of a mechanical stage with vernier scales on the X and Yaxes is highly recommended. Scanning is normally done using the 10× objective, giving a magnification of 100×. If possible, set up the microscope and stage in such a way that one field of view of the 10× objective coincides with a major division of the vernier scale as this facilitates the process greatly. Conventionally nematodes are counted and identified only when the anterior end lies within the field of view. With practice most nematodes can be identified to genus using the 40× objective, but for some specimens oil immersion (100× objective) may be required, in which case the oil should be removed afterwards with xylene. If the slides are examined in a systematic fashion it is then possible to record the position of specimens, for reference purposes or for later closer examination, by reading the co-ordinates from the vernier scales. If a specimen has come to lie at an awkward angle or with an important feature hidden under a piece of detritus, applying gentle pressure to the coverslip with a firm pointed implement such as the point of a pencil should move it sufficiently to allow identification. Once the slides have been examined they should be stored flat, for example in cardboard slide trays.













pmlnematode_24.jpg (1790 bytes)


pmlnematode_29.jpg (1250 bytes)
pmlnematode_31.jpg (2507 bytes)